Friday, May 15, 2026

The 'Pattanams' of South Asia

Many cities around the world have suffixes, which in cartography is called 'toponymics'. For South Asian (and some Iranian) cities, you'll often find words like -nagar, -abad, -pur, -garh, -stan, -pura and so on. In Europe, you'll see -grad, -gorod, -borg, -burg, -polis, -chester, -ton, -ville and similar suffixes, which also appear in American cities. Similarly, African and Oceanian towns have their own suffixes. This post will explore a less commonly discussed suffix in India, which has roots much older than the others: the word -patnam/-pattana/-patnam. 


These suffixes, like the others, point to a settlement, or more precisely, a port settlement. So, you'll find most of these places near the harbour or along a river. Today, cities like Visakhapatnam, Machilipatnam, Nagapattinam, Srirangapatnam and so on. To keep things simple, we'll skip the Anglicised versions of these names and stick with the original spellings, even though they might sound interesting. For example, Masulipatam and Seringapatam mean exactly the same as their original forms. There are a few more cities we could add, even if they don't have the same suffix, but their names tell you why they should be here. Take Patna and the various Patan(s). Patna is on the River Ganga, while the different Patan(s) are along rivers like the Koyna in Satara, Maharashtra, the Kharun in Durg, Chhattisgarh, the Bagmati in Nepal and even the Arabian Sea in Gujarat.


The significance of towns ending in -pattinam (and similar suffixes) mainly came from the fact that these cities were harbours, inviting trade and commerce with foreign rulers. Therefore, a kingdom with a harbour town was more likely to welcome both commercial and naval attacks. In medieval South Asia, the region opened up to the Arab Caliphates in the west, the Sultanates and empires of Indonesia and Malaysia and even traded with the Sri Lankan empires like Aryachakravartis and Anuradhapura. Even the Swahili city-states and the Adal and Ajuran Sultanates of Somalia recognised the value of -pattinam towns, which helped the Cholas become a maritime power, giving them control over trade and commerce in the waters around India. 


Some names that really shaped Indian history, like Anahilavadapattana or Anhilpataka (now Patan in Gujarat), Prabhasapattana (now Somnath in Gujarat), Gopakapattana or Gopakapuri (Goa Vehla in Goa), Mahodyapuram or Mahodayapattanam (Kondungallur or Cranganore in Kerala), Cholakulavallipattinam (now Nagapattinam in Tamil Nadu), Machilipatnam (in Andhra Pradesh), Kulottungapatnam or Ishakapatnam (now Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh) and so on. These coastal towns were also the capitals of important medieval kingdoms, which meant Indian harbours became important links between Asia and Europe. Along with these trading routes, there were battles and naval conflicts that changed everything, opened up new paths for the colonisers and reshaped religious ideas, which we can still see today. 


Let's not forget the Chola expedition to Nagapattinam in 1025. Rajendra Chola I raided the Srivijayan towns of Kedah, Lamuri, Lamkasuka and Palembang (now in Malaysia and Indonesia), which were the empire's strongholds. This raid helped break their dominance in southeast Asia. Interestingly, this was the only recorded Indian expedition to a foreign land via sea, which cemented the Cholas' status as the supreme masters of the seas. The port town of Gopakapattana (now Goa Velha in Goa) also showcased similar strength. It connected Simhala (Sri Lanka), Unguja (Zanzibar), Larissa (Kuwait), the Pandyas of today's Kerala, the Gaudas of Bengal, Sri Sthanaka (Thane) and the Gurjara clans scattered across Konkan. The port boasted a powerful fleet under Jayakeshi I, the mighty Kadamba ruler who moved its capital to Gopakapattana and bolstered its maritime capabilities. The town of Mahodayapuram, now Kodungallur (formerly Cranganore during the colonial period), had an even older name, Muziris, which linked trade routes with the Roman Empire. It is also thought to be where Apostle Thomas arrived in the first century AD and houses India's oldest mosque, the Cheraman Juma Masjid, built in 629 AD.  


But what did all this really mean for ordinary people? History often celebrates royalty, merchants and traders, who have shaped history through trade and war. What about the common people who weren't sailors or soldiers? The Pattanams welcomed foreigners, so people living in these harbour towns would be exposed to many different ethnicities—Arabs, Persians, Chinese, Africans, Burmese and Europeans—all walking around. And they weren't always merchants; they were also painters, writers, explorers and those who sought knowledge. Along with the fury of wars and violent attacks, this mix brought the exchange of language, culture, music, literature and art, which really shaped India's cultural history. Being in port towns also meant better records of the city's civic life compared to other inland villages, since trade depended heavily on documentation. It also made civilians more accessible to royal authorities, as they were mostly stationed in these towns for better administration and since most of them were capitals, this added to the convenience of the local people. 


Living by the harbours also meant facing more violence, both from people and nature, than in other areas. As Arabs and Europeans arrived and began their military campaigns, the lives of the people became even more difficult. The terrible Periyar floods of 1341 destroyed the city of Mahodayapatnam or Muziris, but the destruction also led to the creation of Vypin and other islands a little south, which is now the birthplace of modern-day Kochi. Settlements like Manikapatna and Khalkatapatna on the Odisha coast began to disappear as the Chilika Lake silted up. Because of this, by the late 18th century, the harbours moved to Balasore, Pipli and Dhamra, leaving the old medieval Oriya harbours behind. Kaveripoompattinam, the early capital of the Cholas, which is now Poompuhar (in the Mayiladuthurai district of Tamil Nadu), was washed away by tsunamis, erosion and flooding. These disasters caused many people to be displaced, which was a much harder job back then than it is today. So, along with the benefits of thriving trade and commerce, these natural disasters really show what life was like in the harbour towns of old India. 


When new towns popped up or people who had lost everything moved to different places, they naturally started blending the existing cultures there. By the Middle Ages, harbour towns had a big Muslim population that mixed Arabic and Malayalam, which became the heart of the Mappila community. When the Portuguese first arrived in the 1500s, for instance, the Creole language in Nagapattinam really took off, especially with the 'Portuguese Patois' thing happening. As ports like Kaveripoompattinam got smaller, Madraspatnam grew and lots of people from South India, speaking Telugu, Tamil, Kannada and even Urdu, started using the local 'Madras Bashai' slang within Tamil. The Periyar flood also pushed Jewish communities out, and they ended up forming a small but important Judeo-Malayalam community, which later moved to Israel in the 1900s.


Here's a list of some of the -pattinams/-pattanas that used to be around on the Indian subcontinent.  




Port / Settlement Location Period Historical significance
Patan
Anhilwad-Patan · Anhilpataka
Patan Dist.,
Gujarat
c. 745 CE – 1304 Capital of the Chaulukya (Solanki) dynasty; one of medieval India’s wealthiest cities. Home to the UNESCO-listed Rani ki Vav stepwell. Famous across the medieval Indian Ocean for its patola double-ikat silk.
Somnath
Prabhasa-pattana · Prabhas Patan
Gir Somnath Dist.,
Gujarat
Ancient – present Temple-port where three rivers meet the Arabian Sea. Sacked by Mahmud of Ghazni in 1025–26 and repeatedly rebuilt. Arab merchants resident here from at least the tenth century.
Kharepatan
Kharepattana
Sindhudurg Dist.,
Maharashtra
By 8th c. CE Principal site of South Konkan Shilahara inscriptions. The 1008 CE Rattaraja copper plates give the full dynastic genealogy. A 1094 CE grant records customs exemptions at Thana, Sopara and Chaul. Later a Maratha–Angre fort, destroyed 1818.
Goa Velha
Gopakapattana · Govapuri · Gove
Tiswadi Taluka,
Goa
c. 750 CE – c. 15th c. One of the great medieval western-coast ports; Kadamba capital from 1050. A copper plate of Jayakeshi I records trade with Sri Lanka, Zanzibar, Bengal and Gujarat. Had a resident Arab quarter and a naval fleet from 1053. Only laterite ruins at low tide survive today.
Vallipattana
Ballipattana · possibly Basurepattana
Goa / South Konkan
(location debated)
Late 8th c. CE Fort recorded in the Kharepatan plates as built by Dhammayira, son of Shilahara founder Sanaphulla. Exact location contested in scholarship.
Kodungallur
Mahodayapuram · Muchiri-pattinam · Muzuris · Cranganore
Thrissur Dist.,
Kerala
1st c. CE – 1341 The Muzuris of Roman writers and Muchiripattinam of Sangam poetry. Chera capital c. 800–1124. Trade documented with the Mediterranean, Arab world and China continuously across the period. Traditional site of St Thomas’s arrival and India’s oldest mosque. Devastated by the Periyar flood of 1341.
Uraiyur
Senkanma-pattinam · Kozhi
Tiruchirappalli,
Tamil Nadu
By Sangam era;
1st–3rd c. CE peak
Sangam-era Chola capital predating Kaveripoompattinam. The Periplus tentatively identifies it as Argaru, source of the finest Indian cotton textiles for Roman export. Now absorbed into Tiruchirappalli.
Periyapattinam
Parakirama-pattinam · Fattan (Ibn Battuta) · Dabadan (Chinese sources)
Ramanathapuram Dist.,
Tamil Nadu
13th – early 15th c. Major medieval Coromandel port visited by Ibn Battuta in 1344. Excavations yield Chinese celadon, Yuan and Ming blue-and-white, and West Asian glazed ware in unusual abundance. Multiple Zheng He voyages (1408, 1412, 1421) made landings here.
Kayalpattinam
Kayal · Cail (Marco Polo) · Old Kayal
Thoothukudi Dist.,
Tamil Nadu
9th–10th c. onward The great Pandyan horse-import emporium. Marco Polo (1292–93) described ships from Hormuz, Aden and Kish unloading Arabian warhorses here. The Marakkayar merchant community, linked to the Hadhramaut, Maldives and Southeast Asia, has lived here for over a millennium.
Adirampattinam
Named after local Maratha-era chief Adiraman
Thanjavur Dist.,
Tamil Nadu
17th–18th c. Coastal trading town and Tamil Muslim cultural centre on the Palk Strait. Dhows from here ran the South India–Sri Lanka–Malaya circuit into the 20th century.
Nagapattinam
Nagai · Cholakulavallipattinam · Negapatam
Nagapattinam Dist.,
Tamil Nadu
7th c. – 1781 (Dutch) Principal Chola naval port — launch point for Rajendra I’s 1025 expedition against Srivijaya. Site of the Chudamani Vihara, a Buddhist monastery endowed by the Srivijayan kingdom. Dutch headquarters on the Coromandel 1660–1781; ceded to the British 1781.
Kaveripoompattinam
Puhar · Pumpuhar · Kaveripattanam · Khaberis (Ptolemy)
Mayiladuthurai Dist.,
Tamil Nadu
By 3rd c. BCE;
peak 1st–4th c. CE
The great Chola capital-port of the Sangam age, described in vivid detail in Pattinappalai and the Buddhist epic Manimekalai. Handled the Roman pepper-for-gold trade. Submerged by tsunami and coastal erosion from roughly the 4th–9th centuries; the 2004 tsunami briefly exposed seabed structures.
Devanampattinam
Devanapatnam · Tegnapatnam · Fort St. David
Cuddalore Dist.,
Tamil Nadu
Dutch 1608;
English from 1690
Dutch fort attempt 1608, abandoned under Portuguese pressure. Sold to the English EIC in 1690 and renamed Fort St. David. British southern India HQ after Madras fell to the French in 1746. Robert Clive was governor here in 1756.
Krishnapatnam
Tirupati Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
Medieval – present A historically modest feeder port valued for its natural depth. Now one of India’s largest deepwater commercial harbours, handling iron ore, coal and container traffic.
Nizampatnam
Petapoli · Petipoli (Dutch & English records)
Bapatla Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
English factory 1611
– present
Medieval Coromandel port under the Golconda Sultanate. English EIC factory established here in 1611, the same year as Masulipatnam. Renamed Nizampatnam under the Asaf Jahi Nizams. The 1977 Andhra cyclone made landfall here.
Motupalli
Desi-Uyyakondan-pattinam · Mousopalli (Ptolemy) · Mutfli (Marco Polo)
Prakasam Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
By 2nd c. CE;
peak 13th–14th c.
Chief port of the Kakatiya Empire. The 1244 CE Abhaya Sasana of Ganapatideva is one of India’s earliest explicit grants of mercantile safety, assuring cargo security after shipwreck and fixing minimal customs duties. Marco Polo called it the diamond kingdom of Mutfli. Now a small fishing village.
Machilipatnam
Maisolia · Masalia (Periplus) · Masulipatam · Bandar
Krishna Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
By 1st c. CE;
Dutch 1605, English 1611
One of the most important ports in Indian maritime history, noted by Ptolemy and the Periplus as a major muslin exporter. Principal port of the Golconda Sultanate. Dutch factory 1605, English 1611, French 1721. The 1864 storm-wave killed an estimated thirty thousand people.
Visakhapatnam
Kulottungapatnam · Ishakapatnam · Vizagapatam
Visakhapatnam Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
1068 CE inscription;
English factory 1682
Renamed by Chola king Kulottunga I; later Ishakapatnam after a Sufi saint. Site of the 1804 Battle of Vizagapatam during the Napoleonic Wars. Now headquarters of India’s Eastern Naval Command.
Bheemunipatnam
Bhimili · Bhima-patnam · Bimlipatam (Dutch)
Visakhapatnam Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
Dutch factory 1628
– 1825
A fishing settlement until the Dutch VOC established a factory in 1628 under a Qutb Shahi farman. One of the principal Dutch settlements on the Coromandel for nearly two centuries. Two Dutch cemeteries survive; oldest grave 1661. Constituted a municipality in 1861.
Kalingapatnam
Kalinga-pattana · Calingapatam
Srikakulam Dist.,
Andhra Pradesh
Ancient – present Historic Kalinga port at the Vamsadhara mouth, regarded as a sailing-point for Kalinga voyages to Southeast Asia commemorated in Odisha’s Bali Yatra festival each Kartik Purnima. A surviving Sufi dargah marks its later importance. Much eroded today.
Manikapatna
Chelitalo (Hiuen Tsang) · Manikpatna
Puri Dist., Odisha
(Chilika Lake)
Early historic – 18th c. Long-lived port at the north-east end of Chilika Lake; identified with the Chelitalo described by 7th-century pilgrim Hiuen Tsang. Excavations yield Roman amphora and rouletted ware at early levels, Chinese celadon through the medieval period, and an Indo-Arabian stone anchor published in Scientific Reports.
Khalkatapatna
Khalkattapatna
Puri Dist., Odisha
(Kushabhadra mouth)
12th–14th c.
principal phase
Medieval Odishan port at the Kushabhadra river mouth near Puri. Excavations confirm Chinese celadon, Islamic glazed ware and Indian stoneware from the 12th–14th centuries. Classified as a dronimukha (river-mouth port) rather than a true pattana in Odishan sources.
Patna
Pataliputra · Pataligrama · Kusumapura · Azimabad
Capital, Bihar c. 490 BCE – present The single most historically significant pattana-class settlement in India. Founded by Ajatashatru of Magadha c. 490 BCE; the Mauryan city under Ashoka may have been the world’s largest. Described by Megasthenes: wooden palisades, sixty-four gates, 570 towers. Renamed Azimabad in 1704. Major centre of the saltpetre, opium and textile trade for Dutch, French and English East India Companies.

Thursday, April 16, 2026

1947 : Karenni States politics

British India was administered through a dual system of provinces and Princely States, spanning from Balochistan to the southernmost tip of the Madras Presidency, and from Bengal to Bombay. On historical political maps, British provinces are typically marked in shades of red, while the native states appear in yellow or chrome. However, during the period between 1824 and 1937—when Burma was annexed to mainland India—a small native territory existed that juggled various administrative possibilities, including the potential of remaining a separate sovereign nation. This was known as the Karenni States (often marked simply as "Karen Tribes" on maps and known today as Kayah State). While members of the Indian National Congress rarely involved themselves in Burmese politics, the pivotal year of 1947 inextricably connected Burma, India, and the Karenni States.

In August 1947, British India was partitioned into the independent Unions of India and Pakistan. Amidst the ongoing upheaval of partition, its former province, Burma, adopted its own constitution just a month later, in September 1947. At that time, Burma was organized into the following administrative units:

  1. Sagaing
  2. Shan States
  3. Wa States
  4. Magwe
  5. Arakan
  6. Mandalay
  7. Pegu
  8. Irrawaddy
  9. Tenasserim

The Karenni (or Karen) tribes were historically administered under the Shan States, serving as a complex administrative unit that vacillated between British protection and sovereign independence. Prior to the 19th century, these tribes were loosely governed under Burmese suzerainty as an autonomous territory. While the annexation of Lower Burma between 1824 and 1852 left the Karenni largely unaffected, Burmese supremacy began to wane. By 1852, the region faced increasing British interference, rendering Karenni independence precarious. Caught between two rival powers, the Karenni leaders sought protectorate status from the British; however, the British—having already exhausted significant resources on Lower Burma—were reluctant to establish a new protectorate in the heart of the Indochinese peninsula. Consequently, between 1852 and 1875, the Karenni remained in a state of geopolitical ambiguity, caught between British influence and Burmese expansion.

In 1875, within the newly founded capital of Mandalay, the British administrator Sir Thomas Douglas Forsyth signed a treaty with King Mindon of the Konbaung Dynasty. This agreement formally recognised the Karenni States as independent from both Burma and Britain. This sovereign status created persistent friction between the Konbaungs and the British. It was not until 1892—after both Upper and Lower Burma had been incorporated into British India—that the British reclassified the Karenni States as "feudatory states," a status distinct from the Indian Princely States. A British agent was stationed in Loikaw, and the states of Bawlake, Kantarawaddy, and Kyebogyi agreed to accept a British stipend.

In the early 20th century, administration shifted again as the Karenni States were placed under the Federated Shan States. While legal documents had previously been drafted through the Legislative Council of India due to the region's proximity to Calcutta, the relocation of the capital to Delhi caused a shift in administrative priority. During the early 1900s, the Delhi government was increasingly preoccupied with the Indian independence movement, which largely excluded Burmese politics. Paradoxically, while Burma had been administered as part of British India for strategic reasons, it had historically functioned as a separate entity.

The eventual separation of Burma from India in 1937 drew criticism from Indian leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru. At the 1936 Faizpur session of the Indian National Congress, Nehru denounced the move as a "divide and rule" tactic intended to weaken the independence movements in both regions. Despite the separation, the status of the Karenni States remained unchanged until the chaos of World War II. While the Japanese occupied Burma and Subhas Chandra Bose’s Indian National Army marched along the Karenni periphery in 1942, the region itself remained largely sidelined during the conflict.

Following the war, as British India was partitioned into India and Pakistan, Aung San—the architect of Burmese independence—began campaigning for the integration of the Karenni into a unified Burma. Much like the integration of Princely States occurring simultaneously in India and Pakistan, the Karenni States were eventually absorbed. Following Burma's independence in 1948, these territories became a constituent unit of the new Union of Burma.